Similar Articles
NEW FOR THURSDAY: Assateague Foal Naming Contest Nears End
ASSATEAGUE -- The clock is ticking on a unique opportunity for a holid...READ MORENEW FOR THURSDAY: OC Planning Commission Again Supports Utility’s Substation Expansion
OCEAN CITY – Once again the Planning and Zoning Commission passe...READ MORENEW FOR WEDNESDAY: Big Changes Planned For OC Fire Department Buildings
OCEAN CITY – The Ocean City Fire Department (OCFD) has received ...READ MORENEW FOR TUESDAY: Council Majority Stands Against Outdoor New Year’s Bar
BERLIN -- A packed house of supporters last night at Town Hall wa...READ MORENEW FOR MONDAY: OC Man Busted For Pot Distribution; Ocean Pines Residents Charged With Major Computer Crimes
OCEAN CITY -- A local man was arrested with a significant amount of ma...READ MOREParents Praise Schools In Survey
SNOW HILL -- Though return rates saw a minor drop from 2011 levels, th...READ MORENew Snow Hill High School’s Price Tag Questioned
SNOW HILL -- The cost of a proposed Snow Hill High School (SHHS) renov...READ MORESalisbury Audit Shines Light On ‘Challenging Year’
SALISBURY -- Dormant bank accounts, a re-examination of the city’...READ MOREState Officials Outraged FEMA Denied Further Storm Assistance
OCEAN CITY -- Maryland’s congressional leaders’ appeal for...READ MOREO’Malley Reaches Out To Obama For Offshore Wind Support
OCEAN CITY -- With another General Assembly session looming, and likel...READ MORE
Worcester County Passes New Ethics Code
SNOW HILL -- A new ethics code was passed by the Worcester County Commissioners as an emergency bill Tuesday, though the code’s authority stops a little short of what one commissioner hoped.
A state-wide policy is forcing all counties to bring their ethics regulations in-line with the Maryland minimum or higher. When the changes were first announced last month, county attorney Sonny Bloxom informed the commission the updates will be relatively minor and mostly concern extending the detail of mandatory financial disclosures and clarifying the boundaries of what constitutes a conflict of interest.
Tuesday, the proposed changes were passed into law with little comments. However, Commissioner Louise Gulyas did reiterate an argument she made weeks ago.
“I think this is the most invasive thing,” she said of the new code, particularly financial disclosure mandates.
However, Gulyas decided to vote for the changes since they are required by the state. Commissioner Virgil Shockley, who was not in attendance at the time but relayed his concerns through Commission President Bud Church, asked language be added to the bill extending the same regulations the commissioners, Planning Commission, and Board of Zoning Appeals fall under to the Ethics Board.
“If you’re going to judge, you should be judged equally,” said Shockley. “It’s the way the process works.”
Shockley clarified his concern wasn’t as much with the Ethics Board having to make the same financial disclosures the commissioners do, but focused more on the area of possible conflict of interest. Also, he felt that for a member of that board to make an even, informed decision, they should share the same perspective of the person they’re passing judgment on.
“In order to appreciate what everybody else on that list [of boards and commissions] has to go through, they themselves on the ethics board have to be put through the same test…you can’t understand someone if you don’t walk a mile in their shoes,” he said.
Despite Shockley’s suggestion, Bloxom advised the commission to pass the bill without extending its effects onto the Ethics Board. “They’re not out there on the frontline,” he said.
Bloxom also noted what he perceives as a difficulty in appointing members to the Ethics Board. Cracking down with further restrictions, he said, could make it more difficult to find candidates. The commission decided to follow Bloxom’s recommendation.
Leave a comment
There are no comments.