Similar Articles

NEW FOR THURSDAY: Larger ‘Flagship’ Liquor Store Eyed For Route 50

BERLIN -- The liquor industry in Worcester County could change dramati...READ MORE

NEW FOR WEDNESDAY: Public Outcry, Crash Data Leads State To Reverse Earlier Traffic Light Decision

SNOW HILL -- One troubled intersection in the south end of Worcester C...READ MORE

NEW FOR WEDNESDAY: New Arts Center Now Open In Ocean City; Grand Opening Set For March 1

OCEAN CITY – The new Ocean City Center for the Arts is anxiously...READ MORE

NEW FOR MONDAY: 30th Annual Boat Show Growing To Meet Demand

OCEAN CITY -- The Seaside Boat Show, sponsored by the Ocean City-Berli...READ MORE

NEW FOR FRIDAY: Three Men Charged With Theft From Wal-Mart

BERLIN -- Three Salisbury residents were arrested on theft and theft s...READ MORE

Wicomico County Looks To Phase Out Inventory Tax

SALIBSURY – The Wicomico County Council is weighing whether to e...READ MORE

State Now Mulling New 113 Traffic Light

SNOW HILL -- Collective protests from the Snow Hill community and uniq...READ MORE

State Gun Debate Heats Up As Governor Testifies For Changes

ANNAPOLIS -- The first salvo in what has become a heated debate over t...READ MORE

Showell Students Score Wins At International Fest

BERLIN -- Though they couldn’t make the trip to Kentucky to part...READ MORE

Septic Repeal Bill Still Alive

BERLIN -- A local delegate’s effort to repeal the state’s ...READ MORE

Stricter Penalties For Ignoring Grass Weighed In Berlin

8/26/2011 | By Staff Writer, Travis Brown

BERLIN -- As part of its continuing effort to reign in a few wayward property owners, Berlin is planning on leveling stricter lawn maintenance penalties, though the changes likely won’t affect residents until next spring.

On Monday, the Mayor and Council were given a list of nearby communities and the penalties those towns level against property owners who ignore their lawns. Of the list of seven municipalities, Berlin was tied with Pocomoke for being the most lenient. Because of that leniency, the council felt many neglectful property owners take advantage of the town, which mows lawns for a relatively low fee after a property has exceeded the current 10-inch height limit.

In response, the 10-inch limit is being dropped to six inches, and instead of receiving seven days’ notice before the town sends an employee to cut the grass, only five days’ notice will be given.

Planning and Zoning Director Chuck Ward informed the council that both the height reduction and the need for less notice will allow the town to act quicker in addressing overgrown lawns.

“Ninety-nine percent of people in this town keep extremely well maintained lawns,” he said.

According to Ward, there is a sharp divide between those who take care of their yard and those who do not.

“They either cut their grass regularly or they don’t,” agreed Mayor Gee Williams.

Generally, only the property owners who hit 10 inches, said Ward, will reach the new six-inch limit. Along with a crackdown on when the town will step in, the council also proposed almost doubling the fee it charges to cut lawns, while also tacking on an additional fine.

Currently, the cost to a homeowner if the town is forced to mow their lawn is about $55 an hour, depending on what equipment is used. The council plans on bumping that up to $100 an hour as well as charging an extra flat penalty of $50 for a first violation, and $100 for each subsequent infraction.

At the $55 an hour rate, the worry was that some property owners might decide letting the town cut their grass is equivalent to, if not cheaper, then hiring a private groundskeeper to do it. With a bigger hammer coming down on those who choose to turn the town into their personal gardeners, the council believes the practice will stop.

The discussion at Monday’s meeting was just preliminary, and the actual ordinance will not be read into the record until the Sept. 12 meeting.

There are 2 comment(s).


I agree that 5 days is too short of a notice, however I agree with the new fine increase
submitted by Don Tabor on August 28, 2011 at 07:01 am
I understand the need to do this. What I would disagree with, as an out of town property owner, is cutting down the warning to 5 days. By the time you would get the notice in the mail, time would be up and it takes me 6 hours to get there and may not be able to leave that day. I don't think 10 days notice would be unreasonable, and would not make a noticeable difference.
submitted by Domenic DiVirgilio Jr. on August 26, 2011 at 09:13 am

Leave a comment

Please complete all required fields.
Name*
Email
Comment*

Submit