Similar Articles

NEW FOR THURSDAY: Indian Sculpture’s Future In Ocean City Unclear

OCEAN CITY -- With restoration funding uncertain, the future of the la...READ MORE

NEW FOR WEDNESDAY: Beer, Bean Can Assault Suspect In Hot Water Again

OCEAN CITY -- An Ocean City woman, arrested twice within a few hours t...READ MORE

NEW FOR TUESDAY: Four Arrested In Worcester Now Headed To Federal Court

BERLIN - Four men arrested and charged initially with drug distributio...READ MORE

NEW FOR MONDAY: Komen Race For The Cure Eyes April Return To OC

OCEAN CITY -- The boards in Ocean City will once again be flooded with...READ MORE

County Prepared To Handle Disasters, Staff Assures

SNOW HILL -- Hurricane season does not begin until June, but the Worce...READ MORE

City Okays Employee Pay Study

SALISBURY – The City of Salisbury will receive an outsider’...READ MORE

Council Tables Elected Officials’ Travel Policy Changes

SALISBURY – A discussion over elected officials’ travel ex...READ MORE

O’Malley Makes Big Push For Wind Energy Legislation

ANNAPOLIS -- Governor Martin O’Malley this week made his first b...READ MORE

Stricter Penalties For Ignoring Grass Weighed In Berlin

8/26/2011 | By Staff Writer, Travis Brown

BERLIN -- As part of its continuing effort to reign in a few wayward property owners, Berlin is planning on leveling stricter lawn maintenance penalties, though the changes likely won’t affect residents until next spring.

On Monday, the Mayor and Council were given a list of nearby communities and the penalties those towns level against property owners who ignore their lawns. Of the list of seven municipalities, Berlin was tied with Pocomoke for being the most lenient. Because of that leniency, the council felt many neglectful property owners take advantage of the town, which mows lawns for a relatively low fee after a property has exceeded the current 10-inch height limit.

In response, the 10-inch limit is being dropped to six inches, and instead of receiving seven days’ notice before the town sends an employee to cut the grass, only five days’ notice will be given.

Planning and Zoning Director Chuck Ward informed the council that both the height reduction and the need for less notice will allow the town to act quicker in addressing overgrown lawns.

“Ninety-nine percent of people in this town keep extremely well maintained lawns,” he said.

According to Ward, there is a sharp divide between those who take care of their yard and those who do not.

“They either cut their grass regularly or they don’t,” agreed Mayor Gee Williams.

Generally, only the property owners who hit 10 inches, said Ward, will reach the new six-inch limit. Along with a crackdown on when the town will step in, the council also proposed almost doubling the fee it charges to cut lawns, while also tacking on an additional fine.

Currently, the cost to a homeowner if the town is forced to mow their lawn is about $55 an hour, depending on what equipment is used. The council plans on bumping that up to $100 an hour as well as charging an extra flat penalty of $50 for a first violation, and $100 for each subsequent infraction.

At the $55 an hour rate, the worry was that some property owners might decide letting the town cut their grass is equivalent to, if not cheaper, then hiring a private groundskeeper to do it. With a bigger hammer coming down on those who choose to turn the town into their personal gardeners, the council believes the practice will stop.

The discussion at Monday’s meeting was just preliminary, and the actual ordinance will not be read into the record until the Sept. 12 meeting.

There are 2 comment(s).


I agree that 5 days is too short of a notice, however I agree with the new fine increase
submitted by Don Tabor on August 28, 2011 at 07:01 am
I understand the need to do this. What I would disagree with, as an out of town property owner, is cutting down the warning to 5 days. By the time you would get the notice in the mail, time would be up and it takes me 6 hours to get there and may not be able to leave that day. I don't think 10 days notice would be unreasonable, and would not make a noticeable difference.
submitted by Domenic DiVirgilio Jr. on August 26, 2011 at 09:13 am

Leave a comment

Please complete all required fields.
Name*
Email
Comment*

Submit