Similar Articles
Major Renovation Underway At Royalton Hotel
OCEAN CITY – The Royalton Hotel is presently undergoing some ren...READ MOREPottery Place Now Funky, Fun And Fabulous In Rehoboth, Too
OCEAN CITY – The Pottery Place has served Fenwick Island for nea...READ MOREBenefit Planned To Help Resident’s Recovery
SALISBURY -- In October of 2010, 20-year-old James Cook suffered a spi...READ MOREResidents Question Need For Employee Pay Hikes
BERLIN -- Mayor Gee Williams defended his decision to grant town emplo...READ MORETickets Now On Sale For Dew Tour’s Stop In Resort
OCEAN CITY – Dew Tour tickets are officially on sale for the eve...READ MOREPerformers Eye Showdown With City Hall
OCEAN CITY – Boardwalk performers are planning a protest this we...READ MOREPAC 14 Pleads For Level Funding In Salisbury Budget
SALISBURY – Facing funding cuts, the city’s own government...READ MORERestaurant Week Returns June 5
OCEAN CITY -- Local chefs are preparing to tempt your taste buds. The...READ MOREWhat's For Dinner?
West Ocean City- Berlin Ocean Pines-Fruitland Breakfast Cafe Of Ocean ...READ MOREOcean City Mayor Researching Room Tax
OCEAN CITY – Mayor Rick Meehan is conducting an informal poll of...READ MORE
Half Of Eligible Wicomico Workers Opt To Retire Early
SALISBURY -- Wicomico County’s government workforce will soon see a considerable reduction after over half of the 80 employees have opted to take advantage of the incentive-laden early retirement opportunity.
In March, the County Council voted to approve the early retirement incentive program after a lengthy debate about the potential savings and the need to fill the resulting vacancies with new hires at lower salary rates and benefit packages. Roughly 80 employees qualified for the early retirement incentive plan, and County Executive Rick Pollitt last week announced 44 had taken advantage of the opportunity.
Employees eligible for the early retirement plan were required to have 25 years of service with the county or be at least 55 years old with five years of service. The plan would add five extra years of service to a retiring employee’s pension plan, which could add thousands of dollars to their retirement benefit package.
The benefit for the county is replacing long-time employees who are close to retirement age anyway and who have climbed the salary ladder over several years of service with new hires starting on the front end of the salary and benefit scale. In many cases, the retiring employees might not need to be replaced, eliminating a substantial amount of salary and benefits from the coming budget. Pollitt said this week the benefits of the early retirement incentive plan for the city was twofold.
“This exercise is an opportunity to not only reward faithful county employees for their long and devoted service to the people of Wicomico County, but is a further opportunity to restructure our government in a fashion that is more reflective of the challenging economic times in which we live yet still provide a decent level of county services for our community,” he said.
After the council approved the early retirement incentive plan in March, eligible employees had until last Monday to make their decision. For the 44 who opted to take the plan, they will officially become retired on July 1.
Pollitt said the program will save the city $100,000 in fiscal year 2012 alone, with the real financial benefit being realized for years to come.
“As I advised the County Council when I announced this program, the real savings will be realized in fiscal years to come in the form of a smaller, restructured county government,” he said. “Bear in mind that those eligible for this incentive are long-time employees and are entitled to compensation for accrued annual and sick leave, requiring a substantial payout of accruals.”
There are 1 comment(s).
Leave a comment
In the former case (a), you are getting less skilled employees, and either they will work out poorly (at least in the short term), because you needed the skills of the longer term employees, or, you never really need the longer term higher-paid employees at all, and in effect were just paying them too high a salary. I'd bet the latter was the case (very typical).
In the latter case (b), the unneeded employees should have been thanked for their services and terminated with agreed-upon severance pay, but NOT an enhanced pension. By providing an enhanced pension to such employees, the elected officials are failing in their duty to taxpayers by unnecessarily giving away Taxpayers' money (not THEIR money) just so they won't feel bad by simply laying these employees off.
Lastly, where is the calculation comparing the supposed 'savings' against the long term value of the enhanced pensions and likely greater retiree healthcare subsidies. RARELY is there a REAL 'savings' under these type of enhanced pensions. In fact, it is usually a lousy deal for taxpayers when ALL elements of the deal are properly considered. If the elected officials did not get a PROFESSIONAL estimate of the cost of the enhanced pensions ... LONG TERM, not just for the next few years) ... they have failed miserably with respect to their duty to taxpayers.